Chapter 5 of 5
Phi and psi angles map backbone conformations. Allowed regions explain recurring secondary structure, while folding kinetics and energy landscapes explain how proteins reach native structures on biological timescales.
Developed by G. N. Ramachandran in 1963, the Ramachandran plot is a two-dimensional map of the backbone dihedral angles phi (rotation about the N-Cα bond) and psi (rotation about the Cα-C bond) for each amino acid residue. Most phi-psi combinations are sterically forbidden because of clashes between carbonyl oxygen, amide hydrogen, and side-chain atoms. The remaining favorable regions align with well-known regular secondary structures seen in crystal and NMR structures.

A Ramachandran plot showing the distribution of phi/psi torsion angles from ~100,000 residues in high-resolution crystal structures, with alpha-helix and beta-strand regions labeled.
Dcrjsr, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0
Glycine has no side chain beyond a hydrogen at Cα, so steric constraints are minimal and its allowed phi-psi region is much larger than for other residues. Glycine is therefore enriched in tight turns and loops where other amino acids would clash.
Proline cyclizes the backbone through its side chain, which constrains phi to a narrow range (near ~ -60° in many structures) and introduces unique local geometry. Proline also has a higher intrinsic rate of cis peptide bonds, especially in X-Pro sequences, compared with typical peptide bonds at non-proline positions.
2-aminoacetic acid
Glycine lacks a side chain (R = H), which eliminates steric clashes with backbone atoms. This gives glycine the largest allowed region in the Ramachandran plot and makes it common in tight turns and loops.
Formula
C2H5NO2
Mol. Weight
75.03 g/mol
A naive estimate treats each residue as having only a handful of sterically accessible combinations. Even so, a 100-residue chain would confront an enormous conformational space (often illustrated with order-of-magnitude arguments such as ~3100 discrete states). If each state were sampled on a picosecond timescale, the total time to explore all states at random would exceed cosmological timescales. Yet many small proteins fold in milliseconds to seconds under physiological conditions. The resolution is that folding is not a uniform random search: native contacts and cooperative formation of structure guide the chain along kinetically accessible routes.
The modern view encodes this bias as a free-energy landscape shaped like a funnel. The breadth at the top represents many high-entropy unfolded conformations; the bottom corresponds to the low-energy native ensemble. Folding proceeds downhill in free energy through increasingly native-like intermediates rather than visiting all possible unfolded arrangements equally.
Under some conditions, proteins populate a molten globule state with: (1) substantial native-like secondary structure, (2) a hydrophobic core that is not fully locked into native packing, (3) absence of fixed tertiary contacts characteristic of the native fold, and (4) a larger hydrodynamic radius than the native protein.
Experimental signatures include enhanced binding of ANS (reporting solvent-exposed hydrophobic clusters), circular dichroism spectra consistent with helix and sheet content, and broadened NMR lines reflecting conformational exchange on intermediate timescales.
Quick Check
Which amino acid has the LARGEST allowed region in the Ramachandran plot?
Fill in the Blank
Levinthal's paradox highlights the fact that proteins fold in milliseconds rather than exploring all possible conformations, implying that folding follows a ________ rather than a random conformational search.
Was this helpful? Rate it!
Turn your notes into courses, practice tests, study games, and narrated videos - or build full interactive study worlds - then publish, download, and share them however you like.